Analytic Philosophy...

Well I think I'm in the right place with this post. In essence, here is an idea I'm sharing and I would like some discussion about it:

It seems a field of energy does entirely encompass all that we are. I call this the encompassing field. I also consider this field of energy to be the universe-consciousness. Unity.

This field also interconnects all of our consciousness. The degree to which each of us is aware of the reality of our interconnected consciousness varies from one to another. It may even vary for each of us from time to time. I call this interconnected consciousness the collective-consciousness.

The universe-consciousness is the unity of consciousness which this collective is.

UC is self aware and very aware of all life. Life, being energy, is UC. Please understand UC is alive. UC experiences and manifests it’s awareness in present-moments as reality itself is unfolded.

As with all that has awareness, UC manifests intention. Consider the possibility of discernment being represented in that which is appreciated and that which is not.

I am curious about the UC intending to encourage the things it appreciates. This is possible.

Some things in this world never change. Some things do. Each choice you make cannot be undone.

It never changes. It simply means we do make choice consciously when we intend. That’s important.

All temporal objects vibrate. Is it the case that the smaller the object the faster it’s vibration?

Are there non-temporal objects? If there are non-temporal objects, do they vibrate?

6.5.5

That which is our shared understanding grows and this is change. Yet what we share in understanding does not change. This is God (UC) growing.

A shared understanding is our agreement about what is true for us.

Wherever anything happens for the first time – There is God.

Shared understanding must exist for trust to exist.

This is where faith is unconscious.

Now we trust that our shared understanding does represent what we trust as the known itself.

Enter agreement.

Intention is connected to thought as we choose what we intend. The thoughts which occur and result from the intention we form are manifestations of our intention as we thought it.

It is true that we don’t always appreciate these resulting thoughts. Our resolution of our experience of thought is not without some importance, since it is possible for unresolved things to develop in this manner.

Sometimes thoughts may occur which do reflect part of the path taken in the formation of intention, yet which do not represent the ultimate conclusion of the path formed by the intention.

Where this is also true, a simple return to the idea of the accepted final intention may reinforce the choice. Ah, hah hah hah… Intentions are choices. Beautiful!

Our intention is to fold others into our shared understanding and trust, through agreement.

Our intention is to enfold them into the collective through shared understanding, trust, and agreement.

Right now both of those statements work pretty well it seems to me.

This way we exist, our consciousness interconnected through the shared energy which is our understanding - as the conscious collective.

Commitment is important to agreement. I notice that shared understanding is required for trust and trust is also required for shared understanding. We do not share understanding in that which is outside of trust for any of us. Is the creation understandable without trust? What creation do you ask? I answer: it is the proposed intention. It is to say that sometimes we do not understand the choosing we experience. It is then not true for us. Again, intention and choosing are connected.

This is the direction of energy in flow from shared understanding and trust – they are connected… outward.

Agreement makes growth of the shared understanding. So then, agreement is connected to shared understanding. It seems we may attempt to bring trust into existence where it is not now, by agreeing about shared understanding.

O the opportunity in Harmony of shared intention.

I intend to grow in shared understanding and in shared intention through trust. It is possible for us to agree to share intentions. It may also be possible that some growth of our shared understanding is necessary to establish shared intentions.

I am willing to manifest shared understanding and trust as my part of the connection with others through agreement. These agreements represent the acknowledgement of those connected, that our shared understanding is equally true for each of us.

Is it possible that a shared understanding is more true for one than another? If that were true can trust truly exist? Hm... I know trust exists.

We agree that another exists and we are not them. Yet we are totally interconnected through the UC. So it is true that you are more you, than I am you. This is not, however, true from the perspective of the UC. UC is absolutely all that each of us is, and all that each of us is.